Home›Insights›EU AI Act for US companies
Guide · for US legal, security & product teams

The EU AI Act for US companies: does it apply to you, and what to do in the next 90 days

The EU AI Act (Reg. (EU) 2024/1689) doesn't stop at the EU border. If your AI system's output reaches someone in the EU, it can apply to you — regardless of where you're incorporated. Here's how to check, and what to do about it before your next board or procurement review.

01 · Reach

"We're a US company" isn't a reason it doesn't apply.

Article 2 of the AI Act reaches providers and deployers outside the EU whenever they place an AI system on the EU market, or the system's output is used within the EU. Location of incorporation is not the test — location of effect is.

Likely in scope

Signs you're covered

  • You sell into the EU, even through a reseller or a regional subsidiary.
  • EU-based customers, users or employees see or are affected by the system's output.
  • Your product page, pricing or support targets EU markets.
  • You supply an AI system or a general-purpose AI model that an EU company integrates into its own product.
Lower risk, for now

Signs you're not — yet

  • Your product and its output are US-only, with no EU customers, users or data subjects in sight.
  • You have no plans to expand into the EU market in the near term.
  • Revisit this the moment either of those changes — reach is assessed on effect, not intent.
02 · Timeline

What's live now, and what's coming.

The AI Act phases in over several years — and the schedule for the heaviest obligations recently moved.

2 Feb 2025Art. 5 prohibited-practice bans and Art. 4 AI-literacy duty apply2 Aug 2025General-purpose AI (GPAI) model rules apply2 Aug 2026Art. 50 transparency obligations (e.g., disclosing AI-generated content) apply27 Jul 2026Digital Omnibus Reg. (EU) 2026/1744 enters into force2 Dec 2027Annex III high-risk obligations apply (pushed back by the Digital Omnibus)2 Aug 2028Annex I high-risk obligations apply (pushed back by the Digital Omnibus)
03 · Self-check

Six questions to find out where you stand.

Answer honestly — the goal is an accurate map, not a comfortable one.

  1. 01Do any customers, users or employees affected by your system's output sit in the EU?
  2. 02Is your product marketed or sold into the EU, even indirectly through a partner or reseller?
  3. 03Does your system make or materially shape a decision about an EU-based person — credit, employment, insurance, access to essential services?
  4. 04Could any feature resemble an Art. 5 prohibited practice — social scoring, manipulative techniques, certain biometric categorisation?
  5. 05Do you build on a third-party general-purpose AI model whose GPAI obligations have applied since 2 Aug 2025?
  6. 06Will any of the above become true within your current 12-month roadmap?

Answered yes to any of the first five? You're likely in scope today. All no, but yes to the sixth? Build the compliance work into the roadmap now, not after launch.

04 · US overlap

The EU AI Act doesn't replace your US obligations — it adds to them.

Several US state rules are already in force or land before the AI Act's high-risk deadlines. Build to the strictest one that applies to you.

RuleStatusWhat it covers
California CCPA — ADMT rulesEffective 1 Jan 2026; compliance for existing uses required by 1 Jan 2027Automated decision-making technology used on California residents
California SB 531 Jan 2026Frontier AI model developers
Illinois HB 37731 Jan 2026AI use in employment decisions
NYC Local Law 144In force; enforcement tighteningAutomated employment decision tools
Colorado SB 26-1891 Jan 2027High-risk AI systems and consumer protection
New York RAISE Act1 Jan 2027Frontier AI model safety and transparency

A December 2025 executive order pushed for federal preemption of state AI rules. That push is contested and unresolved — don't assume it removes any state-level obligation above, and it has no bearing on the EU AI Act at all.

05 · Your 90-day plan

A sequence that doesn't require a rebuild later.

Same underlying work — inventory, classify, disclose, monitor — whichever rulebook you're closest to.

Days 1–30

Inventory & classify

  • List every AI system in production or in build, and where its output lands.
  • Flag any that reach EU users, customers or employees.
  • Classify each against Art. 5 prohibitions and the high-risk Annexes.
  • Name an owner for AI-literacy training under Art. 4.
Days 31–60

Close the near-term gaps

  • Deliver Art. 4 AI-literacy training to staff who build or operate the systems — already required.
  • Draft Art. 50 transparency disclosures ahead of the 2 Aug 2026 deadline.
  • Align in parallel with whichever US state deadline lands first for you.
Days 61–90

Document & monitor

  • Finalise a policy pack and a sign-off process for new AI features.
  • Prepare procurement-ready answers for EU customers who ask.
  • Set a quarterly check against the Digital Omnibus timeline — the high-risk dates can move again.
How Celthrac helps

We build to EU standards by default — so this isn't a special project.

Every system we ship already accounts for the AI Act, GDPR and the US rules that apply to mid-market teams. Three ways in:

AI Opportunity Sprint

Use-case shortlist, data & system map, and risk classification against the EU AI Act and relevant US state rules — in 1–2 weeks, fixed fee.

AI Governance Starter

Inventory of AI already in use, Art. 4 literacy training, an Art. 50 transparency check, and a policy pack your legal team can file.

AgentOps

Ongoing monitoring, evaluation, compliance logs and human-on-the-loop escalation once you're live — priced monthly, no lock-in.

Let's build

Know whereyou stand.

Send us your current AI inventory — we'll tell you honestly what applies and what doesn't.

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.